mastodon.green is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Plant trees while you use Mastodon. A server originally for people in the EU, but now open for anyone in the world

Administered by:

Server stats:

1.2K
active users

#SystematicReview

1 post1 participant0 posts today

In 1993, H. Schwabl published in @PNASNews a seminal paper: “Yolk [as] a source of maternal testosterone for developing birds”

This was the first study proposing a link between maternal egg hormones and fitness.

Our preregistered #systematicreview & #metaanalysis in Ecology Letters synthesises 438 effects from 57 studies on 19 wild 🐦species to test if & how egg hormones relate to fitness

📰 doi.org/10.1111/ele.70100

Data & Code github.com/ASanchez-Tojar/meta

Pre-registration doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/KU47W

Replied in thread

@DeutscherBildungsserver Im #Schulportal gibt es auch eine Rezension zur zweiten Auflage der 2009 erschienenen #Hattie-Studie - „Visible Learning 2.0“ ist 2024 erschienen. Aus 138 Einflussfaktoren sind 357 geworden. Auch die Zahl der Metanalysen ist auf über 2.100 gestiegen. Insgesamt sind die Ergebnisse von 130.000 Studien in die Neuauflage eingeflossen.
deutsches-schulportal.de/unter
#bildungsforschung #Schulforschung #eduresearch #systematicreview #Unterrichtsforschung

Das Deutsche Schulportal„Visible Learning 2.0“ – Die Hattie-Studie geht in die zweite RundeDie zweite Auflage von John Hatties Werk „Visible Learning“ ist erschienen.

I agree with all the points made in these letters, except to point out that #sexoffender #treatmentprogrammes were withdrawn because a #systematicreview a number of years ago demonstrated, not only did they not reduce #reoffending, in some cases they actually increased its likelihood. That's not to say we don't need treatment programmes. But we need to make sure they work first.

Cut #sentences in half to tackle #prisons crisis | Prisons and probation | The Guardian
theguardian.com/society/2024/d

The Guardian · Cut sentences in half to tackle prisons crisisBy Guardian staff reporter

Happy to share our new #preprint—the first-ever #SystematicReview on global catastrophic risk. 🌍

We explores the growing field of #GlobalCatastrophicRisk and #ExistentialRisk, which focus on global threats like #NuclearWar. This bibliometric analysis shows how the field has expanded and diversified over the past 20 years and has made substantial contributions to understanding and preparing for #humanity's biggest risks.

eartharxiv.org/repository/view

Continued thread

12/

Examples of paths for #FakeScience to manipulate evidence (in future, potentially, maybe even in a deliberate malicious way): their impact on #SystematicReview studies [7]

There is "a growing number of systematic review authors who have lost faith in the evidence base they depend on".

"The size of the problem is not clear, but a manuscript posted to the Center for Open Science’s OSF preprint server in September suggests up to one in seven published papers are fabricated or falsified"

Excited to share this #preprint of a #SystematicReview of Relationship Between #ClimateAnxiety and Environmentally Relevant Behaviours

The review was led by Alice Roberts as part of her #PhD/#DClinPsy

#EnvironmentalPsychology #ClimateDistress #ClimateChange

osf.io/h69sc/

OSF A Systematic Review of the Relationship Between Climate Anxiety and Environmentally Relevant Behaviours Background: The notion of ‘climate anxiety’ has received increasing attention in recent years. There is however inconsistency in the literature regarding associations with environmentally relevant behaviours (ERBs), concerning behaviours which helo mitigate against climate change. This systematic review sought to systematically identify, appraise and synthesise findings from studies exploring this association. Methods: Peer-reviewed, empirical studies using quantitative approaches to explore climate anxiety and associations with various ‘public’ and ‘private’ sphere ERBs were the focus of this review. Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase and ERIC databases were searched in May 2023. The Quality of Survey Studies in Psychology (Q-SSP) quality assessment checklist was used to assess study quality. A narrative synthesis grouped findings according to similarities in conceptualisations and measurement approaches. Results: 24 studies were reviewed, including over 35,000 participants. Most studies were considered of acceptable quality. Despite representation from 40 countries, participants were largely from predominantly individualistic and Western, Educated, Industrialised, Rich and Democratic (WEIRD) cultures, with notable gender, sex and age biases among samples. Positive associations were frequently observed between climate anxiety and ERBs. Some studies reported non-significant associations, while negative associations were less common. Stronger associations were observed in relation to: (i) less severe and functionally impairing climate anxiety, (ii) public sphere ERBs, (iii) behavioural intentions and willingness as compared to self-reported behaviours, (iv) composite scores on measures, (v) WEIRD and individualistic cultural orientations. Stronger associations were observed when correlation analyses were used, while inferential approaches incorporating other variables revealed less consistent and more nuanced findings. Discussion: Results indicate climate anxiety may, for many, be associated with ERBs. Methodological approaches, individual and systemic factors may, however, influence this relationship. While this review is not without limitations, findings may contribute to a broader, complex and multifaceted picture regarding the adaptive versus maladaptive nature of climate anxiety. Hosted on the Open Science Framework
Continued thread

How do you conduct a #SystematicReview? What are the requirements, and what types of reviews exist? What is the best search strategy for you?

Our information specialist Ina Vrolijk helps researchers find their way through the jungle of databases and search strings.

🔗 rug.nl/library/news/240621-mee

Our online guide provides hands-on tips:
🔗 libguides.rug.nl/systematic-re