# orderedItems[].object.content
@michiel

It certainly does make a difference.
But for what period?
And how certain for months into the future?

# orderedItems[].object.contentMap.en
@michiel

It certainly does make a difference.
But for what period?
And how certain for months into the future?

# orderedItems[].object.content
@bert_hubert

In other words, please avoid exaggeration.

# orderedItems[].object.contentMap.en
@bert_hubert

In other words, please avoid exaggeration.

# orderedItems[].object.content
@bert_hubert
The steep drop at the end of 2023 appears to be steeper than the one you showed for 2024.

# orderedItems[].object.contentMap.en
@bert_hubert
The steep drop at the end of 2023 appears to be steeper than the one you showed for 2024.

# orderedItems[].object.content
@helenczerski

Simply inspiring.

# orderedItems[].object.contentMap.en
@helenczerski

Simply inspiring.

# orderedItems[].object.content
@b0rk

I gave up on those redirections. The python module that I'm currently working on has functions with these names:

do_command_return_code,
do_command_return_code_no_stdout_stderr (to the log instead),
do_command (exception on non zero exit),
do_command_no_stdout_stderr, and
do_command_stdout.

As the pythonistas say: explicit is better than implicit.

# orderedItems[].object.contentMap.en
@b0rk

I gave up on those redirections. The python module that I'm currently working on has functions with these names:

do_command_return_code,
do_command_return_code_no_stdout_stderr (to the log instead),
do_command (exception on non zero exit),
do_command_no_stdout_stderr, and
do_command_stdout.

As the pythonistas say: explicit is better than implicit.

# orderedItems[].object.content
@tymwol

Don't worry, after mastering eating with chopsticks they can simply take them in the other hand.

# orderedItems[].object.contentMap.en
@tymwol

Don't worry, after mastering eating with chopsticks they can simply take them in the other hand.

# orderedItems[].object.content
@simontatham @cks @oclsc @b0rk

Hmmm, I will probably never get rid of `!!` :)

# orderedItems[].object.contentMap.en
@simontatham @cks @oclsc @b0rk

Hmmm, I will probably never get rid of `!!` :)

# orderedItems[].object.content
@bobulous

I also ran into this a few times, but never on a performance critical path so I just left the clone() in the entry() key argument.

AFAICT the only way to avoid a needless clone() in such cases is to use contains_key() and insert(), but then two hash computations may be needed.

Actually I'd hope that the optimizer can remove the clone() or the 2nd hash computation here.

# orderedItems[].object.contentMap.en
@bobulous

I also ran into this a few times, but never on a performance critical path so I just left the clone() in the entry() key argument.

AFAICT the only way to avoid a needless clone() in such cases is to use contains_key() and insert(), but then two hash computations may be needed.

Actually I'd hope that the optimizer can remove the clone() or the 2nd hash computation here.

# orderedItems[].object.content
@Em0nM4stodon

I'm working on privacy for your smart meter values. And this can also work for your energy bills.

# orderedItems[].object.contentMap.en
@Em0nM4stodon

I'm working on privacy for your smart meter values. And this can also work for your energy bills.

# orderedItems[].object.content
@aadmaa @mcc

https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/sync/ato mic/

# orderedItems[].object.contentMap.en
@aadmaa @mcc

https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/sync/ato mic/

# orderedItems[].object.content
@janrosenow

S-curves have inflection points where they begin to decelerate. At least for the EV sales I would have expected to see that here.

# orderedItems[].object.contentMap.en
@janrosenow

S-curves have inflection points where they begin to decelerate. At least for the EV sales I would have expected to see that here.