mastodon.green is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Plant trees while you use Mastodon. A server originally for people in the EU, but now open for anyone in the world

Administered by:

Server stats:

1.2K
active users

#nuclear

52 posts31 participants6 posts today

"Indian engineering company Larsen & Toubro has dispatched the fourth of eight steam generators intended for units 5 and 6 at the Kaiga nuclear power plant in Karnataka State.

With the dispatch of the component - about 24 metres in length, with a diameter of about 4 metres and weighing more than 200 tonnes - from its A M Naik Heavy Engineering Complex in Hazira, Gujarat, Larsen & Toubro (L&T) said it has now "completed the delivery of a set of four steam generators (SGs) for one unit for the indigenously developed 10x700 MWe Pressurised Heavy Water Reactor Fleet Programme".

Steam generators are heat exchangers used to convert water into steam from heat produced in a nuclear reactor core. In PHWRs, the coolant is pumped, at high pressure to prevent boiling, from the reactor coolant pump, through the nuclear reactor core, and through the tube side of the steam generators before returning to the pump.

The previous three steam generators for Kaiga 5 and 6 were delivered to the construction site between August 2024 and early February this year.

"The fourth SG has been dispatched nine months ahead of the contractual schedule, while the full set of four SGs has been delivered in 45 months," L&T noted. "Setting a global benchmark, the first of the lot was delivered in just 33 months."

Anil V Parab, director and senior executive vice president at Heavy Engineering and L&T Valves, said: "L&T Heavy Engineering's nuclear team continues to be the industry trend-setter. Our large talent pool, trained in robust nuclear quality culture, ensures consistent first-time-right execution and globally benchmarked deliveries. This accomplishment is in alignment with the Honourable PM's Viksit Bharat 2047 vision of achieving at least 100 GWe nuclear power generation."

Kaiga 5 and 6 will be the first of ten Indian-designed 700 MWe pressurised heavy water reactors (PHWRs) to be built using a fleet mode of construction to bring economies of scale as well as maximising efficiency, which have been given administrative approval and financial sanction by the Indian government. Excavation works for the units began in May 2022.

Two 700 MWe PHWR units have already been built at Kakrapar, in Gujurat, and are already in commercial operation, while another, Rajasthan unit 7, was connected to the grid last month and is expected to begin commercial operation later this year."

#Nuclear #News #India

world-nuclear-news.org/article

(Image: L&T)
World Nuclear NewsFourth steam generator for new Kaiga units completedIndian engineering company Larsen & Toubro has dispatched the fourth of eight steam generators intended for units 5 and 6 at the Kaiga nuclear power plant in Karnataka State. ;

The World surpasses 40% clean electricity with Europe leading as a 'solar superpower'.

The world generated more than 40% of its electricity from low-carbon sources in 2024, for the EU it's 71%.

Solar energy is soaring in a targeted race to build an entirely clean electricity system. Solar in the EU almost doubled in the three years to 2024 to account for 11% of electricity.

mediafaro.org/article/20250408

A PV system on the roof of the science park in Gelsenkirchen, Germany - the European country which generates the most solar electricity. - Copyright AP Photo/Martin Meissner
Euronews · The World surpasses 40% clean electricity with Europe leading as a 'solar superpower'.By Euronews

The World surpasses 40% clean electricity with Europe leading as a 'solar superpower'.

The world generated more than 40% of its electricity from low-carbon sources in 2024, for the EU it's 71%.

Solar energy is soaring in a targeted race to build an entirely clean electricity system. Solar in the EU almost doubled in the three years to 2024 to account for 11% of electricity.

mediafaro.org/article/20250408

A PV system on the roof of the science park in Gelsenkirchen, Germany - the European country which generates the most solar electricity. - Copyright AP Photo/Martin Meissner
Euronews · The World surpasses 40% clean electricity with Europe leading as a 'solar superpower'.By Euronews

"The nuclear fuel cycle is the series of industrial processes that turns uranium into electricity. Claire Maden takes a look at the steps that make up the cycle, the major players and the potential pinch-points.

The nuclear fuel cycle starts with the mining of uranium ore and ends with the disposal of nuclear waste. (Ore is simply the naturally occurring material from which a mineral or minerals of economic value can be extracted).

We talk about the front end of the fuel cycle - that is, the processes needed to mine the ore, extract uranium from it, refine it, and turn it into a fuel assembly that can be loaded into a nuclear reactor - and the back end of the fuel cycle - what happens to the fuel after it's been used. If the used fuel is treated as waste, and disposed of, this is known as an "open" fuel cycle. It can also be reprocessed to recover uranium and other fissile materials which can be reused in what is known as a "closed" fuel cycle.

The World Nuclear Association's Information Library has a detailed overview of the fuel cycle here. But in a nutshell, the front end of the fuel cycle is made up of mining and milling, conversion, enrichment and fuel fabrication. Fuel then spends typically about three years inside a reactor, after which it may go into temporary storage before reprocessing, and recycling before the waste produced is disposed of - these steps are the back end of the fuel cycle.

The processes that make up the fuel cycle are carried out by companies all over the world. Some companies specialise in one particular area or service; some offer services in several areas of the fuel cycle. Some are state-owned, some are in the private sector. Underpinning all these separate offerings is the transport sector to get the materials to where they need to be - and overarching all of it is the global market for nuclear fuel and fuel cycle services.

How do they do it?

Let's start at the very front of the front end: uranium mining.

Depending on the type of mineralisation and the geological setting, uranium can be mined by open pit or underground mining methods, or by dissolving and recovering it via wells. This is known as in-situ recovery - ISR - or in-situ leaching, and is now the most widely used method: Kazakhstan produces more uranium than any other country, and all by in-situ methods.

Uranium mined by conventional methods is recovered at a mill where the ore is crushed, ground and then treated with sulphuric acid (or a strong alkaline solution, depending on the circumstances) to dissolve the uranium oxides, a process known as leaching.

Whether the uranium was leached in-situ or in a mill, the next stage of the process is similar for both routes: the uranium is separated by ion exchange.

Ion exchange is a method of removing dissolved uranium ions from a solution using a specially selected resin or polymer. The uranium ions bind reversibly to the resin, while impurities are washed away. The uranium is then stripped from the resin into another solution from which it is precipitated, dried and packed, usually as uranium oxide concentrate (U3O8) powder - often referred to as "yellowcake".

More than a dozen countries produce uranium, although about two thirds of world production comes from mines in three countries - Kazakhstan, Canada and Australia Namibia, Niger and Uzbekistan are also significant producers.

The next stage in the process is conversion - a chemical process to refine the U3O8 to uranium dioxide (UO2), which can then be converted into uranium hexafluoride (UF6) gas. This is the raw material for the next stage of the cycle: enrichment.

Unenriched, or natural, uranium contains about 0.7% of the fissile uranium-235 (U-235) isotope. ("Fissile" means it's capable of undergoing the fission process by which energy is produced in a nuclear reactor). The rest is the non-fissile uranium-238 isotope. Most nuclear reactors need fuel containing between 3.5% and 5% U-235. This is also known as low-enriched uranium, or LEU. Advanced reactor designs that are now being developed - and many small modular reactors - will require higher enrichments still. This material, containing between 5% and 20% U-235 - is known as high-assay low-enriched uranium, or HALEU. And some reactors - for example the Canadian-designed Candu - use natural uranium as their fuel and don’t require enrichment services. But more of that later.

Enrichment increases the concentration of the fissile isotope by passing the gaseous UF6 through gas centrifuges, in which a fast spinning rotor inside a vacuum casing makes use of the very slight difference in mass between the fissile and non-fissile isotopes to separate them. As the rotor spins, the concentration of molecules containing heavier, non-fissile, isotopes near the outer wall of the cylinder increases, with a corresponding increase in the concentration of molecules containing the lighter U-235 isotope towards the centre. World Nuclear Association’s information paper on uranium enrichment contains more details about the enrichment process and technology.

Enriched uranium is then reconverted from the fluoride to the oxide - a powder - for fabrication into nuclear fuel assemblies.

So that's the front end of the fuel cycle. Then, there is the back end: the management of the used fuel after its removal from a nuclear reactor. This might be reprocessed to recover fissile and fertile materials in order to provide fresh fuel for existing and future nuclear power plants.

Who, where and when

That's a pared-down look at the processes that make up the front end of the fuel cycle - the "how" of getting uranium from the ground and into the reactor. But how does that work on a global scale when much of the world's uranium is produced in countries that do not (yet) use nuclear power? And that brings us to: the market.

The players in the nuclear fuel market are the producers and suppliers (the uranium miners, converters, enrichers and fuel fabricators), the consumers of nuclear fuel (nuclear utilities, both public and privately owned), and various other participants such as agents, traders, investors, intermediaries and governments.

As well as the uranium, there is also the market for the services needed to turn it into fuel assemblies ready for loading into a power plant. And the nuclear fuel cycle's international dimension means that uranium mined in Australia, for example, may be converted in Canada, enriched in the UK and fabricated in Sweden, for a reactor in South Africa. In practice, nuclear materials are often exchanged - swapped - to avoid the need to transport materials from place to place as they go through the various processing stages in the nuclear fuel cycle.

Uranium is traded in two ways: the spot market, for which prices are reported daily, and mid- to long-term contracts, sometimes referred to as the term market. Utilities buy some uranium on the spot market - but so do players from the financial community. In recent years, such investors have been buying physical stocks of uranium for investment purposes.

Most uranium trade is via 3-15 year long-term contracts with producers selling directly to utilities at a higher price than the spot market - although prices specified in term contracts tend to be tied to the spot price at the time of delivery. And like all mineral commodity markets, the uranium market tends to be cyclical, with prices that rise and fall depending on demand and perceptions of scarcity.

The spot market in uranium is a physical market, with traders, brokers, producers and utilities acting bilaterally. Unlike many other commodities such as gold or oil, there is no formal exchange for uranium. Uranium price indicators are developed and published by a small number of private business organisations, notably UxC, LLC and Tradetech, both of which have long-running price series.

Likewise, conversion and enrichment services are bought and sold on both spot and term contracts, but fuel fabrication services are not procured in quite the same way. Fuel assemblies are specifically designed for particular types of reactors and are made to exacting standards and regulatory requirements. In the words of World Nuclear Association's flagship fuel cycle report, nuclear fuel is not a fungible commodity, but a high-tech product accompanied by specialist support.

Bottlenecks and challenges

Uranium is mined and milled at many sites around the world, but the subsequent stages of the fuel cycle are carried out in a limited number of specialised facilities.

Anyone unfamiliar with the sector might wonder why all the different stages of mining, enrichment, conversion and fabrication are not done at the same location. Simply put, conversion and enrichment services tend to be centralised because of the specialised nature and the sheer scale of the plants, and also because of the international regime to prevent the risk of nuclear weapons proliferation.

Commercial conversion plants are found in Canada, China, France, Russia and the USA.

Uranium enrichment is strategically sensitive from a non-proliferation standpoint so there are strict international controls to ensure that civilian enrichment plants are not used to produce uranium of much higher enrichment levels (90% U-235 and above) that could be used in nuclear weapons. Enrichment is also very capital intensive. For these reasons, there are relatively few commercial enrichment suppliers operating a limited number of facilities worldwide.

There are three major enrichment producers at present: Orano, Rosatom, and Urenco operating large commercial enrichment plants in France, Germany, Netherlands, the UK, USA, and Russia. CNNC is a major domestic supplier in China.

So the availability of capacity, particularly in conversion and enrichment, can potentially lead to bottlenecks and challenges to the nuclear fuel supply chain. Likewise, interruptions to transport routes and geopolitical issues can also potentially impact the supply of nuclear materials. For example, current US enrichment capacity is not sufficient to fulfil all the requirements of its domestic nuclear power plants, and the USA relies on overseas enrichment services. But in 2024, US legislation was enacted banning the import of Russian-produced LEU until the end of 2040, with Russia placing tit-for-tat restrictions on exports of the material to the USA.

The fabrication of that LEU into reactor fuel is the last step in the process of turning uranium into nuclear fuel rods. Fuel rods are batched into assemblies that are specifically designed for particular types of reactors and are made to exacting standards by specialist companies. Most of the main fuel fabricators are also reactor vendors (or owned by them), and they usually supply the initial cores and early reloads for reactors built to their own designs. The World Nuclear Association information paper on Nuclear Fuel and its Fabrication gives a deeper dive into this sector.

So - that’s an introduction to the nuclear fuel cycle - and we haven't even touched on the so-called back end, which is what happens to that fuel after it has spent around three years in the reactor core generating electricity, and the ways in which used fuel could be recycled to continue providing energy for years to come."

#Nuclear #News

world-nuclear-news.org/article

Yellowcake (Image: Dean Calma/IAEA)
World Nuclear NewsA guide: Uranium and the nuclear fuel cycleThe nuclear fuel cycle is the series of industrial processes that turns uranium into electricity. Claire Maden takes a look at the steps that make up the cycle, the major players and the potential pinch-points. ;

President Donald Trump said Monday the U.S. will hold direct talks with Iran about its nuclear program, while warning the Iranians they would be in “great danger” if the talks don’t succeed in persuading them to abandon their nuclear weapons program. FRANCE 24's Saeed Azimi reports from Tehran.
#Iran #nuclear #Trump

youtube.com/watch?v=uSJf1LOGGAU

alojapan.com/1240026/methane-g Methane gas detected above permissible levels at Osaka Expo venue #asia #biz #Japan #JapanBroadcastingCorporation #news #nhk #NhkWorld #NHKWORLDPREMIUM #NhkWorldTv #NHKWorld #Nuclear #Osaka #OsakaNews #PublicBroadcaster #RadioJapan #tech #world #大阪 #大阪府 Methane gas at levels that could explode has been detected at the 2025 World Exposition site in Osaka City, western Japan. The Japan Association for the 2025 World Expo has pledged to tighten…

As long as you're happy waiting 50 years before the journey time is cut by half (I'm sceptical)

'Startup Says Its Nuclear Fusion Rocket Could Cut Time to Mars in Half'

futurism.com/nuclear-fusion-ro

'The firm is hoping to achieve fusion in orbit for the first time in 2027, a moonshot plan that could put far-flung destinations in our solar system within much easier reach — if everything goes perfectly according to plan, at least.'

Futurism · Startup Says Its Nuclear Fusion Rocket Could Cut Time to Mars in HalfBy Victor Tangermann

alojapan.com/1239789/universit University of Tokyo to launch new faculty to attract students from abroad #asia #biz #Japan #JapanBroadcastingCorporation #news #nhk #NhkWorld #NHKWORLDPREMIUM #NhkWorldTv #NHKWorld #Nuclear #PublicBroadcaster #RadioJapan #tech #Tokyo #TokyoNews #world #東京 #東京都 The University of Tokyo will launch its first new faculty in 70 years in the fall of 2027. It will offer an integrated bachelor’s and master’s five-year program taught entirely in Engl…

Excellent (long) piece!

“Apocalypse From Within: How American Imperial Decay Fuels Nuclear Risk: Why US Dysfunction is the Greatest Nuclear Threat”

by Raja Sohail Bashir in The Geopolitical Compass on Substack

“High-profile warnings from figures like Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, suggesting a declining America is uniquely prone to nuclear first-use, underscore a visceral fear demanding rigorous analysis”

open.substack.com/pub/hailyb/p

The Geopolitical Compass · Apocalypse From Within: How American Imperial Decay Fuels Nuclear RiskBy Raja Sohail Bashir
#Press#US#Decline

alojapan.com/1239547/japans-em Japan’s Emperor, Empress to visit Ioto Island on Monday to honor war dead #asia #biz #Japan #JapanBroadcastingCorporation #news #nhk #NhkWorld #NHKWORLDPREMIUM #NhkWorldTv #NHKWorld #Nuclear #PublicBroadcaster #RadioJapan #tech #VisitJapan #world Japan’s Emperor Naruhito and Empress Masako will visit the Japanese island of Ioto for the first time on Monday to remember those who died in World War Two. This year marks 80 years since the e…

"The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission has announced its decision to authorise Ontario Power Generation to construct a BWRX-300 reactor at the Darlington New Nuclear Project site in Clarington, Ontario.

In making its decision, the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) said it had concluded that Ontario Power Generation (OPG) is qualified to carry out the activities authorised under the licence; that the company has adequate programmes in place to ensure that the health and safety of workers, the public and the environment will be protected; and that it will make adequate provision for the maintenance of national security and to implement Canada's international obligations.

The licence is valid until 31 March 2035, and includes site-specific licence conditions as well as regulatory hold-points during the construction process where OPG is required to provide additional information to the CNSC before it may continue.

The decision by the Commission does not authorise the operation of the reactor: this would be subject to a future licensing hearing and decision, "should OPG come forward with a licence application to do so", the regulator said.

Ontario Power Generation applied for a licence to prepare a site for the reactor in September 2006, and the CNSC began the environmental assessment process in May 2007. This was completed in 2012, with a determination from the Government of Canada that the Darlington New Nuclear Project was not likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects.

In December 2021, OPG announced that it had selected the General Electric Hitachi BWRX-300 reactor for deployment at the site. It applied for the construction licence in October 2022."

#Nuclear #News #Canada

world-nuclear-news.org/article

A rendering of a BWRX-300 plant (Image: GEH)
World Nuclear NewsCanadian regulator issues SMR construction licenceThe Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission has announced its decision to authorise Ontario Power Generation to construct a BWRX-300 reactor at the Darlington New Nuclear Project site in Clarington, Ontario. ;

"Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant has been under Russian military control since March 2022 and its director has said he expects Russian licences for operation of all units to be obtained by the end of 2027. Ukraine's Energoatom says any talk of restarting the units is a violation of nuclear and radiation safety standards.

The current director of Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant (ZNPP), Yuriy Chernichuk, in comments reported by Strana Rosatom said: "Our units have been idle for a long time. Before launching, we will have to carry out a large complex of works to inspect the equipment, repairs, confirm the operability, readiness of the unit for operation."

Russia's nuclear regulator had temporarily recognised Ukrainian nuclear supervision license, he said, but all ZNPP's operations must meet Russian regulations and laws by 2028 for all units.

He said: "We are considering the most realistic option is to first launch units 2 and 6, whose active zones are loaded with Russian-made fuel. All of them were stopped back in September 2022, and since then none of them have operated in generation mode."

One key area of work, he said, was the water supply, following the destruction of the Kakhovka dam, which had previously supplied water. He said they were working on various options, including using the Dnieper river as a source "but of course, it will take a certain amount of time to implement them. I will say this cautiously: it is not one day or one month. And I must immediately stipulate that the starting point for the implementation of all the measures that we are discussing will be the end of hostilities and some guarantee of peace and quiet at the Zaporizhzhya NPP and the territory adjacent to it".

He also said that there would need to be work done to restore power lines from the plant and to decide on the customers for the output of the plant, saying it might provide the chance to redirect the capacity of Rostov NPP "to the energy-deficient North Caucasus ... 6000 MW is quite a serious capacity even for such a large country as ours. Naturally, this will require a redistribution of electricity flows".

The most labour-intensive work required would be inspecting, repairing and preparing equipment and the units for operation. The licence for the first unit expires at the end of 2025 so a new licence will be needed from Russia's nuclear regulator Rostekhnadzor, even if the unit is in cold shutdown. He also said there were other issues, such as there not being a railway line to the plant for the transport of nuclear fuel.

Ukraine rejects restart planning

The Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant was Ukraine's largest, with six units, before it came under Russian military control in March 2022. It is positioned on the frontline of Russian and Ukrainian forces and its future has reportedly been one of the subjects tackled in talks held recently seeking a potential ceasefire and end to the conflict.

Energoatom, which operates Ukraine's nuclear power plants, has maintained throughout the conflict that the only way to restore safety and security at ZNPP is for an end to the Russian occupation and its return to the control of its legal Ukrainian operator, Energoatom.

Energoatom added: "The technical state of the ZNPP and the conditions created ... such as limited communication lines with the power grid, exhaustion of design service life for fuel and equipment, unqualified unlicensed personnel, non-availability of ultimate heat sink, etc, provide solid grounds to confirm that restarting the plant in its current state is technically impossible."

The company said that the condition of critical safety systems had worsened and said that military presence at, and around, the site "are key risk factors that cannot be ignored".

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has had experts at the plant since September 2022 as part of efforts to minimise safety and security risks, including during periods where there has had to be a reliance on back-up diesel generators when external power supplies have been lost.

In IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi's latest update on the situation, he said agency staff this week "reported hearing military activities at varying distances away from the site. The team continued to monitor nuclear safety and security, conducting a walkdown of the reactor buildings of units 1, 3 and 5 and of the turbine halls of units 1 and 2".

Agency teams at Khmelnitsky, Rivne and South Ukraine nuclear power plants all reported hearing air raid alarms over the past week, and at Chernobyl a drone and a loud explosion was heard on 30 March."

#Nuclear #News #Ukraine

world-nuclear-news.org/article

(Image: ZNPP)
World Nuclear NewsZaporizhzhia restart timetable suggested, Ukraine rejects planZaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant has been under Russian military control since March 2022 and its director has said he expects Russian licences for operation of all units to be obtained by the end of 2027. Ukraine's Energoatom says any talk of restarting the units is a violation of nuclear and radiation safety standards. ;

"The US Department of Energy has announced plans to co-locate data centres and new energy infrastructure on its lands, and identified 16 potential sites it says are uniquely positioned for rapid data centre construction.

The list of sites is included in a Request for Information to inform possible use of Department of Energy (DOE) land for artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure development, which says they are "uniquely positioned for rapid data centre construction, including in-place energy infrastructure with the ability to fast-track permitting for new energy generation such as nuclear". The list includes national laboratories, defence-related sites and the sites of two former federally-owned uranium enrichment plants.

The plans are in accordance with executive orders on Removing Barriers to American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence and Unleashing American Energy Executive Orders signed earlier this year by President Donald Trump. They were announced by Energy Secretary Chris Wright during a visit to the DOE's National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) laboratory in Golden, Colorado, who said the global race for AI dominance is "the next Manhattan project".

The DOE said it was seeking input from data centre developers, energy developers, and the broader public to further advance this partnership. The information collected will be used to inform development, encourage private-public partnerships and enable the construction of AI infrastructure at select DOE sites, targeting the start of operation by the end of 2027. The Request for Information also aims to gather information on potential development approaches, technology solutions, operational models, and economic considerations associated with establishing AI infrastructure.

In March, Wright announced actions to ease permitting rules and regulations for construction projects at the national laboratories, which DOE said would accelerate "much-needed critical infrastructure improvement projects" while saving "hundreds of millions" of taxpayer dollars.

The sixteen sites in the RFI are:

Idaho National Laboratory
Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant
Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant
Argonne National Laboratory
Brookhaven National Laboratory
Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
National Energy Technology Laboratory
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
Los Alamos National Laboratory
Sandia National Laboratories
Savannah River Site
Pantex Plant
Kansas City National Security Campus"

#Nuclear #News #US

world-nuclear-news.org/article

Wright made the announcement during a visit to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory campus in Golden, Colorado, his fourth visit to a national laboratory since becoming Energy Secretary earlier this year (Image: DOE/X)
World Nuclear NewsUS national labs identified as potential AI sitesThe US Department of Energy has announced plans to co-locate data centres and new energy infrastructure on its lands, and identified 16 potential sites it says are uniquely positioned for rapid data centre construction. ;

"Ukraine’s national nuclear energy generating company Energoatom has said reactors at the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power station cannot be restarted while the facility remains under Russian control, citing serious safety violations and technical degradation.

The company said in a strongly-worded statement that any discussions about restarting the six-unit facility, which has been occupied by Russia since soon after the February 2022 invasion, would violate international nuclear and radiation safety standards.

The only legitimate operator of the station, near the frontline of fighting in southern Ukraine, is Energoatom, and only Ukrainian specialists have the necessary expertise and authority to manage the facility, the statement said.

“The fact that the largest nuclear power plant in Europe has been under illegal Russian occupation since 2022 creates unacceptable safety risks and violates international conventions on nuclear and radiation safety,” Energoatom said.

“The licence to operate the ZNPP is held by its legal operator, Energoatom, and only Ukrainian specialists have the right and competence to operate the plant.”

Energoatom said Russia’s occupation of Zaporizhzhia has significantly worsened the condition of critical safety systems. It cited a lack of proper maintenance, violation of repair schedules, lack of access to original spare parts and an inability to conduct proper inspections. It said this had led to critical degradation of the equipment and “created the prerequisites for potential emergencies”.

All six units at Zaporizhzhia are in a state of cold shutdown, defined by nuclear regulators as meaning the reactor coolant system is at atmospheric pressure and at a temperature below about 90°C following a reactor cooldown.

Cold shutdown reduces the need for cooling and lessens the risk of an accident. In a cold shutdown, the reactor is in a subcritical state, meaning no nuclear fission is taking place, and the fuel and control rods can be safely removed and replaced.

US president Donald Trump has suggested that as part of a peace deal Washington could take over the running of Zaporizhzhia.

Ukraine’s president Volodymyr Zelenskyy has insisted that “all nuclear power plants belong to the people of Ukraine”."

#Nuclear #News #Ukraine

nucnet.org/news/ukraine-says-z

The Independent Global Nuclear News AgencyUkraine Says Zaporizhzhia Reactors Cannot Be Restarted While Facility Remains Under Russian ControlOccupation has significantly worsened condition of critical safety systems, says Energoatom